Darkroom Diary: Testing Tri-X at EI 3200 Developed in Rodinal
You can watch that video and read the article if you haven't had the opportunity to do that yet.
I need an EI 3200 black and white film and developer solution that produces the types of images that I envision are possible.
I want a solution that doesn't have excessive grain, has open shadows and retains my highlight values.
As discussed last week, I was horribly disappointed with the new Kodak P3200 in D76, so I pushed forward and did some additional testing this week using Tri-X rated at EI 3200 developed in Rodinal using two different development methods (stand, and semi-stand).
In the end, my judgment is based on the quality of my prints. In the video below, I show the two prints that I made using the two different development methods using Rodial and compare these prints to the Kodak P3200 print developed in D76 from last week.
If you do that, send me a note and let me know how it worked out for you.
RODINAL DEVELOPMENT INFORMATION
For the tests this week, I exposed a roll of Tri-X at EI 3200 out in the field with the wild horses. It was the typical early morning low light scene that I frequently work in and often need EI 1600 and EI 3200.
I have rated Tri-X anywhere between EI 250 and EI 1600 with excellent results. I've tested these EI ratings and different development times extensively to find the right balance of shadow detail and highlight retention.
I like performing testing this way because it is based on my end goal. I basically want to find a film and developer combination that will not have excessive grain and doesn't block up the shadows or blow out the highlights at EI 3200.
It's a lot to ask of any black and white film and developer combination, but I know it's possible. I have used Delta 3200 and developed in Microphen for some of my elk photographs and I was very happy with this combination, but this film and developer combination is not something I normally use. I am trying to simplify and minimize the number of films and developers that I use, but I won't simplify unless the quality that I need can be achieved.
I diluted Rodial to 1:50 and developed at 20C for both the stand and semi-stand tests. I wanted to see if the 2-hour stand development would outperform the 35-minute semi-stand method in terms of grain rendering, shadow detail, and highlight retention. I would much rather invest 35 minutes versus 2 hours as long as the results are acceptable.
My develop methods broke down as follows:
Total development time was 120 minutes (2 hours)
Semi-Stand Development Method
Total development time was 35 minutes
NEW EI 3200 IN RODINAL PRINT
The prints below are from my test exposures using Tri-X at EI 3200 and developed in Rodinal using the stand development method. I wasn't concerned with my composition and all of the other details as if they were going to be part of my portfolio at some point. My focus was creating some test exposures in the type of light that I normally work in and of the subjects that I photograph.
I liked the stand development method the best and so I scanned one of the test exposures and processed it in Photoshop using my normal workflow. You can also see the actual print in the video update above.
PRINT COMPARISON WITH TRI-X At EI 1600 in D76 1:1
The images below are scans of the negatives and edited in Photoshop. I scanned the films with the Nikon ES-2 Film Digitizer and the Epson V-850 Pro scanner. I made some prints from these scans with my Epson P800 in the advanced B&W mode on Hahnemühle Fine Art Baryta paper. Those prints look very similar to the digital images below and I am very happy with them. I haven't had time to make some split-grade silver gelatin prints of these images yet, but I plan to do that soon.
Early Morning Centuries
Get Back & Give Me Some Space
New Foal With Mom at Sunrise
NEW ANALOG PHOTOGRAPHY COMMUNITY
If you like the information in this article, then you will love being part of my new Analog Photography Community where we share additional member only details in addition to creating exclusive video tutorials, and detailed articles every week to help analog photographers take their creative vision and technical skills to a higher level.
ANALOG PHOTOGRAPHY LAUNCHPAD
TRAINING FOR ANALOG PHOTOGRAPHERS
Read Testimonials from photographers and collectors from around the world.
Buy Your Photography, Video, & Technology Gear at No Additional Cost To You From B&H Photo
Fujichrome Provia 100F - Fujichrome Velvia 100 - Fujichrome Velvia 50 - Kodak Portra 160 - Kodak Portra 400 - Kodak Ektar 100 - Fujicolor Pro 400H - Fujicolor Crystal Archive Silver Gelatin RA4 Paper - RA-4 Color Print Processing Developer & Processing Chemicals - Color Darkroom Enlargers
ILFORD B&W FILMS & DEVELOPERS
KODAK B&W FILM DEVELOPERS
DARKROOM SUPPLIES & EQUIPMENT
Note: I participate in affiliate programs where I earn a small commission on some select products that I provide links for on my website at www.timlaytonfineart.com. When you use these links, I earn a small commission and there is no additional charge to you.
Keywords: analog photography, black and white, darkroom, Delta 3200, film, Ilford, Kodak, P3200, T-Max P3200, Wildlife, Wildlife Photography
Very interesting results. I would suggest that you try shooting HP5+ at 3200 and developing it in Xtol/Eco Pro. The results are quite remarkable-it lifts the mid-tones without crushing the shadows. I like it better than pushed Tri-X. In fact, I don't really like HP5 at or near box speed but it really comes into its own at 1600, 3200, or even 6400.
Thanks for this Tim, which I found very interesting indeed. I've not used any of the 3 developers you mention (only Ilfosol 3 and HC-110), and I've not pushed film either, so I'm perhaps extremely unqualified to comment. However, as an experiment, you've effectively changed 2 variables each time: Delta 3200 and Microphen, P3200 and D76, and [email protected] and stand. (The exception was [email protected] semi-stand, but you didn't discuss the differences there, presumably because they were insignificant.)
Now I've no idea why you chose the combinations in each case, but it's be a touch more "scientific" if you kept the developer constant across all 3 films. Given that both D76 and Rodinal gave unsatisfactory results, but Microphen gave "spectacular" results with Delta 3200, why not try Microphen with P3200 and with [email protected]? (MDC even gives times for both of them.)
At least in that case there'd only be one variable changing: the film itself!
PS Just a side comment... I'm having trouble viewing your videos recently. They go so far and then stick, despite my excellent internet connection. This one I had to reload 3 times, and then leave for half an hour, to see it right through!
Thank you so much for your effort in testing and comparing these film stocks. If I can dare to give advice, I think for stand development rodinal should be diluted by 1:100 at least. In any case rodinal is no way to go for nice grain being a edge sharpening developer. Also it is not well suited for pushing beyond one stop. I would go for Xtol in a 1:2 dilution. The second problem is scanning. Most disappointed comments about visible or ugly grain come from photographers scanning their negatives. Printing analog in the darkroom very often leads to better results. Scanners are very busy working to scan every grain, not knowing that they deal with an image. Enlargers work with light and collect it to the paper below. Seems to be the appropriate process to bring oldfashioned negatives to shine. This is just my oppinion based on my experience. I m not the person who wants to teach you anything. Please don t mistake me as this. Best regards and thank you again for your work and inspiration. Gilbert
No comments posted.
Recent PostsLarge Format Pictorialist Silver Gelatin Prints Are The New 21st Century Alt Method Darkroom Diary Episode 23 (Ultra Large Format Silver Gelatin Contact Print) Darkroom Diary Episode 22 (Mounting Ice Princess Silver Gelatin Print) Darkroom Underground Episode 1 - Ultra Large Format Paper Negatives Darkroom Underground Episode 1 Preview - Ultra Large Format Paper Negatives at Hodgson Mill New Darkroom Underground Analog Photography Membership Darkroom Diary Episode 21 (Testing Ilford WT as an 8x10 Large Format Paper Negative) Darkroom Diary Episode 20 (TT Signature Pictorialist Lens) How To Make Enlarged Analog Negatives Darkroom Diary Episode 19 (DIY LED Lightbox For Viewing Film)