Exploring Divided Bath DD-23 For Large Format B&W Film Development
What is D-23 black and white film developer and why do photographers use it?
I will help answer those two questions in this article for you, in hopes that you may find a use for it in your darkroom.
The famous photograph by Ansel Adams "Winter Sunrise from Lone Pine" was exposed on Isopan film and developed in D-23. "I used my 8x10 Ansco view camera with the 23-inch component of my Cooke Series XV lens with a Wratten No. 15 (G) filter. The film was Isopan, developed in Kodak D-23" - Ansel Adams
As the title of this article suggests, I will be sharing my thoughts as well as my process for using D-23 as a split-bath developer. When I think about split-bath development, I immediately think variable contrast development and the classic zone system.
In simple terms, Bath A is where the development agent (Metol) is located and in Bath B is where the alkali resides and the remainder of the development is carried out. In theory, one can change the contrast of their negative by varying the amount of time in Bath B. But, is this the case for split-bath D-23? Read the details below to discover how this happens with D-23, and you might be surprised by the information.
I primarily use D-23 for negatives when I want excellent separation of shadow values and brilliant highlights. I can alter my tray development times to increase contrast and density for my platinum and AZO printing, or I can improve my shadow details by altering my development times in the two different solutions.
I find D-23 to be a very versatile developer whether you and making straight silver gelatin contact prints or enlargements or you need more contrast and density for alternative printing processes such as platinum and AZO. It is also very easy to mix from the raw chemicals and it has an excellent shelf life too.
I have created a short list of why I like D-23:
QUICK REFRESHER ON DEVELOPER AGENTS
Black and white film developers typically consist of three main components: developing agent (e.g., Metol), alkaline agent (e.g., borax) and a means to delay oxidation of the developing agent (e.g., sodium sulfite).
Metol along with phenidone (a newer agent) and hydroquinone are common black and white developing agents. Metol is an organic compound and a colorless salt. Metol is known to be a good choice for continuous tone and has been widely used in commercial formulas for many years before Kodak discontinued it. Metol is a highly versatile developing agent and a standard that I keep in my darkroom.
D-23 ECO-FRIENDLY SPLIT-BATH FORMULA
Developer (Solution A)
Process to Make Solution A
Process to Make Solution B
Note: the amount of Borax in Solution B is a topic of debate. I tested formulas ranging from 2g to 10g and I settled on 2g for my formula, but I encourage you to investigate and conduct your own tests. My main motivation for trying DD-23 vs regular D-23 was to control the contrast of my negatives in a couple different scenarios. In some cases, I wanted higher contrast and density for my AZO/Platinum prints and in other cases, like with Ektascan B/RA X-Ray film, I wanted to reduce the contrast by limiting the highlight values without making the shadow values suffer.
1 liter of developer solutions can process approximately 800 square inches of film before discarding it. That would equal about 40 sheets of 4x5 film, 20 sheets of 5x7 film, ten sheets of 8x10 film, and five sheets of 11x14 film.
In other words, you can mix up one liter of developer for your film development session and process a lot of exposures. I usually only expose a few sheets of film per outing, so I have more than enough developer for my session. I use fresh developer for each session and discard it afterward, but I have been testing it after being stored in my darkroom for a month or so, and the results are fine. You can cut the formula by 50% to make 500ml if needed.
I have found that Ilford HP5+ and FP4+ develops to my satisfaction with divided D-23. I frequently use HP5+ sheet film in my 8x10 and 11x14 large format view cameras and FP4+ in my 4x5, 5x7, and 8x10 cameras. I process my films in trays, either in my regular darkroom, on in my film changing tent when I am on the road.
I have three trays lined up (Solution A - Solution B - TF-4). When I am working in my regular darkroom, I have another tray of distilled water to place the freshly developed negative before moving to the film washer. If I am on the road, I just wash my films by placing them in trays and letting them soak and periodically agitate for about an hour until they are fully cleared.
Based on the contrast of my negative being developed, normal, expanded, or contracted, I vary my times in Solution A and you will notice that my time in Solution B remains constant at 3 minutes.
Below are my personal development times for FP4+ and HP5+:
Note: if you are trying to take full advantage of the two-bath compensating effect (control highlights and keep open shadows), then you can explore minimal agitation in Solution B. This is to help ensure that development only continues in Solution B where it was not exhausted in Solution A (highlights).
Most divided bath developers have the developer in Part A and the accelerant in Part B. Because of the amount of sodium sulfite in Solution A; your film is actually being developed without the need for an accelerator. Now that is pretty amazing.
Then when you move your sheet film to Solution B (borax), this is where the magical compensating effect happens because the developer agent (Metol) is quickly exhausted in the high values (dense areas), and the lower values (shadows) will continue to develop. This basically means that you are developing for your high values in Solution A and shadow values in Solution B. This is why I love black and white large format photography so much. The ability to control every part of my creative process is simply awesome.
It is possible to use the development by inspection method on a negative by negative basis, or I just put in the time and found the standard times that work for my style of photography that doesn't require the inspection approach.
You can develop a single sheet of film or multiple sheets at a time using the shuffle method.
Your agitation method will impact your development times and negatives, so keep this in mind when establishing your development times.
For normal and expanded development (N and N+), I place a sheet of film in Solution A and continuously agitate for the first 30 seconds and then 5 seconds every 30 seconds for N development and 10 seconds for N+1 until the development time is completed for this step. I slowly and gently rock my tray for the entire 3 minutes in Solution B.
The negative to the left is a sheet of 5x7 FP4+ developed for N+1. The building in the scene is a historic white schoolhouse.
For contracted development, I place the film in Solution A and agitate for 10 seconds and then 10 seconds per minute until the time is completed for this step. I then place my film in Solution B and give in just a single rocking motion to ensure the film is below the developing solution. For N-1, I gently rock the tray for 5 seconds every minute, and for N-2, I don't agitate the film at all beyond the initial entry in the tray.
After you start developing your negatives and review them, keep in mind the following two variables, and you can really dial in your process for the types of prints that you like to make.
If you want to increase the overall density and contrast of your negatives, then extend your time in Solution A. If you need more shadow detail, process your film in your normal Solution B time, then place the film back in Solution A for 15 seconds, and then back in Solution B for another period of time. Start with times in the range of 1 to 3 minutes and evaluate your negatives.
After development, I move immediately to TF-4 archival fixer which effectively eliminates the need for a stop bath and hypo-clearing agent and also significantly reduces my washing times. I can even develop my negatives on the road in my Harrison Dark Tent which makes this a very user friend solution in my regular darkroom or in my mini-darkroom in my van.
Video Workshops For Analog Photographers
Read Testimonials from photographers and collectors from around the world.
Buy Your Film, Darkroom, and Photography Gear at No Additional Cost To You From B&H Photo
COLOR FILMS, DEVELOPERS, DARKROOM GEAR
Fujichrome Provia 100F - Fujichrome Velvia 100 - Fujichrome Velvia 50 - Kodak Portra 160 - Kodak Portra 400 - Kodak Ektar 100 - Fujicolor Pro 400H - Fujicolor Crystal Archive Silver Gelatin RA4 Paper - RA-4 Color Print Processing Developer & Processing Chemicals - Color Darkroom Enlargers
ILFORD B&W FILMS & DEVELOPERS
KODAK B&W FILM DEVELOPERS
DARKROOM SUPPLIES & EQUIPMENT
Note: I participate in affiliate programs where I earn a small commission on some select products that I provide links for on my website at www.timlaytonfineart.com. When you use these links, I earn a small commission and there is no additional charge to you.
Keywords: black and white photography, darkroom, darkroom digest, dry plate, large format, large format photography, metering, silver gelatin
Hi Robert, thanks for the question. The amount of Borax in Solution B is a topic of debate. I tested formulas ranging from 2g to 10g and I settled on 2g for my formula, but I encourage you to investigate and conduct your own tests. My main motivation for trying DD-23 vs regular D-23 was to control the contrast of my negatives in a couple different scenarios. In some cases, I wanted higher contrast and density for my AZO/Platinum prints and in other cases, like with Ektascan B/RA X-Ray film, I wanted to reduce the contrast by limiting the highlight values without making the shadow values suffer.
If you are trying to take full advantage of the two-bath compensating effect (control highlights and keep open shadows), then you can explore minimal agitation in Solution B. This is to help ensure that development only continues in Solution B where it was not exhausted in Solution A (highlights). Keep me posted on your testing of D-23 and DD-23.
Just want to be clear: Solution B is 2 grams of Borax per liter? Can that be correct? That's a much weaker Borax solution than in any other divided developer I've come across. Thanks!
No comments posted.
Recent PostsLarge Format Pictorialist Silver Gelatin Prints Are The New 21st Century Alt Method Darkroom Diary Episode 23 (Ultra Large Format Silver Gelatin Contact Print) Darkroom Diary Episode 22 (Mounting Ice Princess Silver Gelatin Print) Darkroom Underground Episode 1 - Ultra Large Format Paper Negatives Darkroom Underground Episode 1 Preview - Ultra Large Format Paper Negatives at Hodgson Mill New Darkroom Underground Analog Photography Membership Darkroom Diary Episode 21 (Testing Ilford WT as an 8x10 Large Format Paper Negative) Darkroom Diary Episode 20 (TT Signature Pictorialist Lens) How To Make Enlarged Analog Negatives Darkroom Diary Episode 19 (DIY LED Lightbox For Viewing Film)