How To Calculate New Exposure Times for Different Size Enlargements in the Darkroom

August 05, 2016  •  3 Comments

Receive my Darkroom Diary updates every Saturday at 9AM CT where I share my insider tips and tutorials with film and darkroom photographers. Get sneak peeks inside my darkroom and studio and early access to to my latest fine art prints. [Hint: I give away free fine art prints to my Darkroom Diary readers, so don't miss out.]

Read the latest issue of the Darkroom Underground Magazine where we bring you leading articles and tutorials from photographers around the world and the latest portfolios of leading analog photographers.
received a great question from one of my Darkroom Diary Subscribers (thanks, Rey) and I thought I would create a blog post to share this information with others because I get this question from time to time.  

Rey wanted to know how to calculate the new exposure time when making a larger print in the darkroom.  As you can probably guess, as your light source in the enlarger gets farther away from the print, you will need more exposure time.  

There is no need to guess, or make test strips and waste a lot of time.  By using the inverse square law for light, the math will do the work for you.  

This is yet another reason why I love classic darkroom photography... I get to do cool math and figure things out!

I walk through an example below to illustrate the variables and math required to do this. You could very easily automate this with some spreadsheet software.


Variables you need to use:
(A) Original exposure time
(B) Original dimension (long edge)
(C) New dimension (long edge)
(D) New exposure time

New Exposure Time (D) = ((C/B) x (C/B)) x A


New Exposure Time (D) = ((C / B)^2) X A (this version is faster because it calculates the square of C/B). 

Let’s say you made an 8x10 print at your exposure was 26 seconds
Now, you want to make the exact same print, but bigger, an 11x14 print.  

New Exposure Time = ((14/10) x (14/10)) x 26

If we break the math down it looks like this:
((1.4) x (1.4) x 26
(1.96) x 26 = 50.96 or 51 seconds

Video Workshops For Analog Photographers

Tim Layton Fine Art All Access Pass B&W Darkroom Photography Video WorkshopB&W Darkroom Photography Video Workshop Large Format Photography Video Workshop SeriesLarge Format Photography Video Workshop Series B&W Large Format Floral Still Life Video WorkshopB&W Large Format Floral Still Life Video Workshop Large Format B&W Film Testing Video WorkshopLarge Format B&W Film Testing Video Workshop Large Format Paper Negative Video WorkshopLarge Format Paper Negative Video Workshop DIY UV Printer Design & Build Video WorkshopDIY UV Printer Design & Build Video Workshop Platinum & Palladium Printmaking with Vellum Video WorkshopPlatinum & Palladium Printmaking with Vellum Video Workshop

Read Testimonials from photographers and collectors from around the world. 

Buy Your Film, Darkroom, and Photography Gear at No Additional Cost To You From B&H Photo


Fujichrome Provia 100F - Fujichrome Velvia 100 - Fujichrome Velvia 50 - Kodak Portra 160 - Kodak Portra 400  - Kodak Ektar 100 - Fujicolor Pro 400H - Fujicolor Crystal Archive Silver Gelatin RA4 Paper - RA-4 Color Print Processing Developer & Processing Chemicals - Color Darkroom Enlargers 


Ilford HP5 PlusIlford FP4 Plus - Ilford Delta 100 - Ilford Delta 400 - Ilford Delta 3200 - Ilford Pan F Plus - Ilford XP2 Super - Ilford SFX - Ilford ID-11 - Ilford DD-X - Ilford Microphen


Kodak Tri-X - Kodak T-Max 100 - Kodak T-Max 400 - Kodak Portra 160 - Kodak Portra 400 - Kodak Ektar 100 - Kodak P-3200 - Kodak Ektachrome - Kodak D-76 - Kodak XTOL - Kodak HC-110

Jobo CPP-3 processer - Ilford RC Pearl Paper - Ilford RC Glossy Paper - Ilford Multigrade Fiber Paper - Ilford Stop Bath - Ilford Rapid Fixer - Neutral FixerKodak Photo-Flo - Hypo Clearing Agent - Darkroom Trays - Chemical Storage Jugs - Nitrile Gloves - Film Archival Storage Sleeves - Archival Storage Binder - Archival Print Storage Boxes

Note: I participate in affiliate programs where I earn a small commission on some select products that I provide links for on my website at When you use these links, I earn a small commission and there is no additional charge to you.



A possible point of confusion in your explanation(non-registered)
Tim, your formula works but ... (C/B)^2 will give the the square of C/B, which is correct. You might consider editing your text, getting rid of "this version is faster because it uses square root".
Using the formula for the square root would mean using the formula (C/B)^0.5 which would lead to an incorrect answer.
How about this "this version is faster because it calculates the square of C/B"??
Tim Layton Fine Art
Hi Rey, you are welcome. Thanks for the question and keep me posted on your progress.
Rey Castaneda(non-registered)
Thanks a lot Tim! I'll put this in practice in my next printing session. Great help!
No comments posted.