How To Calculate New Exposure Times for Different Size Enlargements in the Darkroom
I received a great question from one of my Darkroom Newsletter Subscribers (thanks, Rey) and I thought I would create a blog post to share this information with others because I get this question from time to time.
Rey wanted to know how to calculate the new exposure time when making a larger print in the darkroom. As you can probably guess, as your light source in the enlarger gets farther away from the print, you will need more exposure time.
There is no need to guess, or make test strips and waste a lot of time. By using the inverse square law for light, the math will do the work for you.
This is yet another reason why I love classic darkroom photography... I get to do cool math and figure things out!
I walk through an example below to illustrate the variables and math required to do this. You could very easily automate this with some spreadsheet software.
Get my Free Darkroom Newsletter and never miss an update again. Subscribe to my annual Tim Layton Fine Art Darkroom Photography Chronicle and receive all of my articles curated into a beautifully formatted PDF eBook every year.
Variables you need to use:
New Exposure Time (D) = ((C/B) x (C/B)) x A
New Exposure Time (D) = ((C / B)^2) X A (this version is faster because it calculates the square of C/B).
Let’s say you made an 8x10 print at your exposure was 26 seconds
New Exposure Time = ((14/10) x (14/10)) x 26
If we break the math down it looks like this:
Get my Free Darkroom Newsletter and never miss an update again. Subscribe to my annual Tim Layton Fine Art Darkroom Photography Chronicle and receive all of my articles curated into a beautifully formatted PDF eBook every year. View my Learning Materials for darkroom and large format photographers that include video workshops, eBooks, and quick reference cards. Purchase copies of the Darkroom Underground Magazine.
A possible point of confusion in your explanation(non-registered)
Tim, your formula works but ... (C/B)^2 will give the the square of C/B, which is correct. You might consider editing your text, getting rid of "this version is faster because it uses square root".
Using the formula for the square root would mean using the formula (C/B)^0.5 which would lead to an incorrect answer.
How about this "this version is faster because it calculates the square of C/B"??
Thanks a lot Tim! I'll put this in practice in my next printing session. Great help!
No comments posted.
Media & News Updates
Support This Blog
Recent PostsJan 2018 Winter Landscapes Photo Contest Winner - Peter Campbell Platinum & Palladium Printmaking With Vellum - Master Series Video Workshop Seeking Pathological Art Collectors! Modern Platinum & Palladium Printmaking With Digital Negatives - Quick Start Guide New Platinum/Palladium Print - Tiger Lily, Limited Edition of 10 New Platinum/Palladium Print - Black Bear Cub, Limited Edition of 10 Film Gear 20% OFF at KEH Through 12/10/17 January 2018 - Paper Negatives Month at Darkroom Underground Follow The Eagles at Norfolk Lake This Winter Photo Contest For Jan 2018 Edition of Darkroom Underground - Winter Landscapes